ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REDESIGN

About the Project

The Challenge:

Upon further inspection of the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, it was discovered that the main purpose of the site was not easily accessible to users. EPA’s site was inefficiently organized and difficult to navigate through, causing user frustration when researching.

The goal of this project was to flesh out usability navigation issues with the current site and develop a cleaner, more engaging layout for visitors.

My Contributions:

Product Designer
User Research, Prototyping & Testing, UI Design

Team:

Audra Miller and Jacob Vasquez

Tools Used:

Figma, Miro, Invision, Trello

The Process

Empathize

  • Proto Persona

  • User Wire Flows

Define

  • Usability Testing

  • Red Lining

  • Navigational Usability Testing

Ideate

  • Mood Board

  • Card Sorting

  • Site Map

Prototype

  • Wireframe Sketches

  • Lo Fidelity Wireframes

  • Lo Fidelity Prototype

Test

  • Usability Testing

  • A/B Testing

  • Hi Fidelity Prototype

  • User Testing

Refine

  • Next Steps

  • KPIs

Empathize

Research and Problem Definition

EPA’s Website Before and After

before after epa.jpg

Why does a user visit epa.gov?

Environmental Topics, Laws and Regulations, and About EPA are the three main headers on epa.gov.  Since most of the site leads users to articles and information about various topics, this site is primarily used for research and the core user actions are: 

  1. To look up laws and regulations to decide whether their work project or home project is up to code

  2. To find contact information for individuals that work at specific environmental departments

  3. To learn more about environmental elements, what is helpful, and what is harmful

Proto Persona

At the beginning of this project, my teammate and I came up with a proto persona for a typical user of EPA’s website.

Slide deck proto persona (1).png

User Wire Flow

Typical User flow to locate the staff directory

  1. Clicks on About EPA Tab on Home Page

  2. Types in last name of person trying to contact

  3. Clicks the individual’s name which is hyperlinked

  4. Finds email address listed at the bottom of the profile page

Define

Identifying Key Issues and User Insights

Initial Research

Usability Testing

We interviewed five users, two of which were visually impaired to get a better sense of which pain points were most prominent in EPA’s website. I conducted two of the tests.

Testing Tasks

  1. Figure out what the laws and regulations are for motorcycle gas emissions.

  2. Find the email address for Alex Almario who works in the Gulf Ecology Division. 

  3. Find 3 different ways to improve the environment of a school.


Infographic1-01.png
 
2x2 (3).png

 Testing Pain Points

From our testing results, we constructed the list of the top frustrations in a graph to find out which would be the highest priority to work on and design for. The top pain points were:

Search Bar Efficiency

  • Users completed tasks easier by using the google search bar instead of the website’s search bar

    Reduce Links

  • The site’s overwhelming amount of links persuaded users to go down many rabbit holes, wasting time and energy

    Color Contrast

  • Some of the site’s colors were not contrasted enough for visually impaired users to easily read

    Navigational Header Clean Up

  • Headers and organization of site needs to be tightened up. Users had trouble locating elements

Frame 4 (1).png
 

Redlining EPA’s Current Website

  1. Contact Us Links
    There are three different ways a user can click to contact the EPA which is redundant.

  2. Icon Inconsistency
    Social media icons and the icon for reporting a violation are inconsistent in sizing and color.

  3. Readability Issues
    Body text color fails a contrast checker.

  4. Headings are not Effectively Titled

    The main headings cause confusion for the user when visiting, wasting space on the main page.

  5. Poor List Organization
    Lists are not consistent and confusing making an overall muddy composition that is not easy to navigate visually.

  6. Link Overload
    Far too many links on each page cause user exhaustion.

Navigational Usability Testing

We conducted four navigational tests on EPA’s website, three on desktop and one on mobile, to locate navigational user pain points.

The three tasks tested were similar to before but users could not use the site’s search bar:

The main takeaways:

  • Homepage content headers not clear or helpful

  • Staff Directory layout is confusing

  • Lack of breadcrumb navigation

  • Information overload without hierarchy caused user exhaustion

Infographic1-02.png

Ideate

Brainstorming and Prioritizing

Card Sorting

We each conducted two card sorting exercises with users. It early on was very clear that the topic headings without context were incredibly varied on EPA’s site. Users struggled figuring out which categories to put certain items.

Main layouts to focus on:

  1. Collect all of the resource links together in one spot

  2. Add context on main page about looking up environmental topics

  3. Streamline the contact links and pages to be easier to navigate

Card Sorting_Test4_JacobAndAudra.jpg

Site Map

Based on our card sorting exercises, we constructed a new site map for EPA, reducing the amount of links on the main page.

Sitemap (5).png
 

Site Redesign Mood Board

We brainstormed collected inspiration for the new site on an Invision board. There’s a vibrancy about our environment that we wanted to capture to make the new site more fun and engaging but also wanted to have structure to keep it professional.

 

 
 

Prototype

Developing Layouts and Formulating

Wireframe Sketches to Lo Fi

Based on user interviews we knew that the new site needed:

  • Focused, helpful content on main page

  • Search bar featured

  • More visuals/typography and less blue hyperlinks everywhere

  • Breadcrumb navigation to help users know where they were in the site at all times to avoid getting lost or giving up

I drew this home page layout wanting to bring down the search bar into the main content area, and highlight EPA’s top two information categories: Environmental Topics and Laws & Regulations. I then turned this into a low fidelity wireframe for desktop and mobile.

Frame 28 (1).png

Test

Testing Prototypes and Iterating

Frame 30.png

AB Testing - Search Bar Location

Initial user testing showed that users favored the search bar on a website to locate information. Because of this we wanted to see which layout gave users easier access to that search bar element.

The main takeaways:

  • 100% of users located the search bar quicker when it was larger and located fully on the home page

  • Testers had to look longer to find the search bar when it was just an icon in the header

 Style Guide

 
9.3-04-UI-Style-Tile-Template (5).png
 

 Hi Fi Prototype

I developed the high fidelity wireframe for the home page along with the Environmental Topics page and Connect with Us page. My partner developed the other three pages.

epa cellphones.jpg

Hi Fi User Testing

The main takeaways:

  • Website has a consistent and well organized design 

  • Users had trouble with interacting with the automatic drop down menu

  • “Connect with Us” as a menu label was not clear. “Contact” should be used instead

  • Need to reduce some font sizes for easier readability

Refine

Improving and Reiterating

EPA before and After.jpg

Next Steps

EPA’s website is a resource page for users to find information. We can measure the product’s success by reducing the amount of time it takes a user to find the information they are looking for. This can be done in the following ways.

  • Develop more pages with consistent breadcrumbs and categorization

  • Design separate tab for EPA to host their research article library

  • Work with engineers to make sure search bar on site searches EPA’s site and not their research article library